Source: Getty
Some industry groups oppose the REPAIR Act over safety and data access concerns, suggesting the SAFE Act as an alternative
A hearing by the US House Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade recently discussed bills, including the Right to Equitable and Professional Auto Industry Repair (REPAIR) Act, according to a report by Repairer Driven News.
Automotive industry organizations opposed the act, arguing it would disrupt the sector, weaken safety and increase risks by expanding access to sensitive driver data. They suggested the Safety as First Emphasis (SAFE) Repair Act as a better alternative to ensure repair parity for the independent market.
A coalition, including the Society of Collision Repair Specialists (SCRS) and the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, expressed its opposition to the REPAIR Act, citing that the US already has a competitive repair ecosystem, with 74% of out-of-warranty repairs being handled by independent repairers. The coalition argued the act would disrupt the existing system and increase cybersecurity vulnerabilities while attempting to federalize issues beyond right-to-repair.
Hilary Cain, Auto Innovators’ senior vice president of policy, testified that the alliance is committed to a comprehensive federal right-to-repair law that does not force automakers to provide unnecessary data. A written testimony added more detail on its views and other bills.
SCRS, through a separate letter, also opposed the REPAIR Act, arguing that independent repairers already have access to the necessary information and tools for safe repairs. It supported the SAFE Repair Act, suggesting that the Act provides necessary access while ensuring safety and competition. Central Florida Paint & Body echoed this sentiment, emphasizing existing access to data and tools, and criticizing the REPAIR Act for potentially benefiting large insurance companies and corporate entities.
Meanwhile, the US-based aftermarket industry body Auto Care Association advocated for the REPAIR Act. In testimony provided to the subcommittee, Bill Hanvey, Auto Care Association's president and CEO, emphasized that safe, affordable and accessible vehicle repair is essential to highway safety and consumer protection, particularly as vehicles become increasingly software-driven and data-dependent.
“Today’s vehicles are computers on wheels,” Hanvey said, noting that manufacturers are increasingly restricting access to critical repair and maintenance data. “When vehicle owners and independent repairers are locked out of that data, repairs are delayed, costs increase and safety can be compromised.”
Hanvey pushed for the inclusion of the REPAIR Act in the Surface Transportation Reauthorization Act, citing its benefits in enhancing safety and addressing data access issues faced by vehicle owners due to restrictions by manufacturers. He cited a survey showing that restrictions prompt repair shops to refer vehicles back to dealerships, thereby increasing costs. The Auto Care Association supported the REPAIR Act due to the increasing need for data access for repairs.
Organizations such as the CAR Coalition and the National Federation of Independent Business also supported the REPAIR Act, highlighting issues with restricted data access and its impact on repair costs and small businesses. They argued that technological advances have allowed manufacturers to limit data access, negatively affecting repair options and costs for small businesses.
In early 2025, a new group of service associations and automakers proposed the SAFE Repair Act, drawing criticisms from associations that are promoting the REPAIR Act, which was at that time reintroduced in Congress. In an analysis in March 2025, S&P Global Mobility took a closer look at both the bills and spoke to associations on both sides of the debate.
Copyright © 2026 Mobility Global. All rights reserved.
These materials, including any software, data, processing technology, information, research, forecasts, model, software or other application or output described herein, or any part thereof (collectively the “Property”) constitute the proprietary and confidential information of Mobility Global Inc. and its affiliates (each and together “Mobility Global”) and/or its third-party provider licensors. Mobility Global on behalf of itself and its third-party licensors reserves all rights in and to the Property. These materials have been prepared solely for information purposes based upon information generally available to the public and from sources believed to be reliable.
Any copying, reproduction, reverse-engineering, modification, distribution, transmission or disclosure of the Property, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of Mobility Global. The Property shall not be used for any unauthorized or unlawful purposes. Mobility Global’s opinions, statements, estimates, projections, quotes and other analyses are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security, and there is no obligation on Mobility Global to update the foregoing or any other element of the Property. The Property and its composition and content are subject to change without notice.
THE PROPERTY IS PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS. NEITHER MOBILITY GLOBAL NOR ANY THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS (TOGETHER, “MOBILITY GLOBAL PARTIES”) MAKE ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE PROPERTY’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE PROPERTY WILL OPERATE IN ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION, NOR ANY WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO ITS ACCURACY, AVAILABILITY, COMPLETENESS OR TIMELINESS, OR TO THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED FROM THE USE OF THE PROPERTY. MOBILITY GLOBAL PARTIES SHALL NOT IN ANY WAY BE LIABLE TO ANY RECIPIENT FOR ANY INACCURACIES, ERRORS OR OMISSIONS REGARDLESS OF THE CAUSE. Without limiting the foregoing, Mobility Global Parties shall have no liability whatsoever to any recipient, whether in contract, in tort (including negligence), under warranty, under statute or otherwise, in respect of any loss or damage suffered by any recipient as a result of or in connection with the Property, or any course of action determined, by it or any third party, whether or not based on or relating to the Property. In no event shall Mobility Global be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees or losses (including without limitation lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Property even if advised of the possibility of such damages. The Property should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions.
The Mobility Global logo is a registered trademark of Mobility Global, and the trademarks of Mobility Global used within this document or materials are protected by international laws. Any other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.
The inclusion of a link to an external website by Mobility Global should not be understood to be an endorsement of that website or the website's owners (or their products/services). Mobility Global is not responsible for either the content or output of external websites.